MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390796760 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000002065

The Leading Causes of Optic Disc Edema Seen in Tertiary Care, Academic Neuro-Ophthalmology Clinics

2024· article· en· W4390796760 on OpenAlexaff
Aaditeya Jhaveri, Bhadra U. Pandya, Farooq Shamshad, Deep Soor, Edward Margolin, Jonathan A. Micieli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePapilledemaNeuro-ophthalmologyOphthalmologyOptic neuritisFundus (uterus)EtiologyOptic discAnterior ischemic optic neuropathyReferralOptic nerveRetrospective cohort studyVisual acuityRetinalSurgeryGlaucomaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Optic disc edema (ODE) is one of the most common reasons for referral to a neuro-ophthalmologist. There are various causes that require vastly different workup. Thus, differentiating among each cause is important. Our goal was to determine the causes of ODE and various clinical characteristics of consecutive patients with ODE presenting to neuro-ophthalmology clinics. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with ODE over a period of 5 years were included. Fundus photographs were routinely obtained as part of clinical care. Clinical data including retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, best-corrected visual acuity, and visual field mean deviation were retrieved, and patients were grouped by etiology. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients (n = 462 or 70.6% women and 192 or 29.4% men) with ODE were included with a mean age of 41.2 ± 17.9 years. Female patients were significantly younger than male patients (mean age female participants: 38.7 years, male participants: 47.6; P < 0.001). The top 5 most common causes of ODE in our clinics were idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH; 351/654 or 53.7%), nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION; 116/654 or 17.4%), non-IIH papilledema (71/654 or 10.9%), optic neuritis (ON; 46/654 or 7.0%), and uveitis (17/654 or 2.6%). When considering female-only patients, the top 3 causes of ODE were IIH, non-IIH papilledema, and NAION. Among male-only patients, the top 3 causes were NAION, IIH, and non-IIH. Among the top 5 causes of ODE, visual acuity was the worst at presentation in the ON group and the best in the patients with IIH. The Humphrey mean deviation was the worst in ON/NAION groups and best in IIH group. The ODE was most severe in patients with non-IIH papilledema and least severe in ON group. Non-IIH patients with papilledema were not significantly different in visual acuity and visual field parameters at presentation compared with patients with IIH papilledema. Patients with papilledema (both IIH and non-IIH etiologies) had significantly better visual function at presentation compared with other top causes of disc edema ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The most common cause of ODE seen in neuro-ophthalmology clinics was IIH, and these patients were more likely to present with preserved visual function. The higher prevalence of IIH was likely why most patients with ODE were women. Visual function at presentation was not able to differentiate the specific cause of papilledema; however, it was an important differentiating factor for all papilledema cases compared with all other causes of ODE including ON and NAION.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207