MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390805165

Guide de performance orale

2019· other· fr· W4390805165 on OpenAlexaff
Narcisse Fomekong Djeugou, Marius Yannick Binyou Bi-Homb, Cédric Christian Ngnaoussi Elongue, Florian Lebret

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2019
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lorsqu’elle est mise en compétition, la parole quitte son statut de patrimoine pour devenirexpression. Dans l’expression orale, tout (e) orateur/oratrice fait face à une série de défisque nous avons recoupés en sept étapes. Plus l’orateur/l’oratrice prends conscience deces défis, mieux il est en même de surmonter le trac, les hésitations, les silences longs, lesbégaiements ou les temps morts etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4010.282

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicEducation, sociology, and vocational training→French-language works237,207→