MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390806268 · doi:10.1525/joae.2024.5.1.7

Methodologically Whirling

2024· article· en· W4390806268 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shemine Gulamhusein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Autoethnography · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoethnographyScholarshipSociologyEpistemologyAestheticsGender studiesArtPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the use of autoethnography and third-wave feminism allows for an exciting, creative, and unruly method to emerge. The author knits together their theoretical location with an autoethnographic methodology, uniquely coining this approach to autoethnography as Third-Wave Dervish. By doing so, the creation of many micro- and macro-reflective spins—the act of whirling—holds space for an ever-evolving process of gaining knowledge from multiple sources such as somatic sensations, understanding through already published scholarship, learning through resistance, revisiting child- and youth-hood journals, and the triggering of lived experiences. This process allows the author to deepen the understanding of living in the in-between of social spaces as an Ismaili Muslim woman in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AutoethnographySame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207