Educação para a Alteridade: contribuições da psicologia analítica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following work is a study of the process of women's individuation, specifically when becoming mothers.Starting with analytic listening in a private clinic of women who are mothers, supported by Carl Gustav Jung's theoretical references, a bibliographical review was carried out to recognize and understand the collective aspects of motherhood as a manifestation of the archetype of the Great Mother since the theme of maternity is being widely discussed in conversation circles, blogs, live streams, among other means of communication.To aid in the comprehension of this study, the analysis of elements from an Inuit mythological folk tale, Sealskin, Soulskin, has been used, following the method of dream analysis suggested by C.G. Jung since this type of narrative is considered by analytical psychology as rich symbolic material, capable of communicating with the human soul.The main character goes through some transformations, challenges, and troubles, generating images that may contribute to the comprehension of the path taken by women in motherhood.This work has shown how the study of archetypes and their expressions, as provided by Jung's depth psychology, is a big and important contribution to the understanding of female manifestations in the behavior of the woman-mother and how the connection with the inner world and the aspects of the Great Feminine may operate important transformations in a woman's life woman and society in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.049 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".