GPU Algorithms for Structured Sparse Matrix Multiplication with Diagonal Storage Schemes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Matrix–matrix multiplication is of singular importance in linear algebra operations with a multitude of applications in scientific and engineering computing. Data structures for storing matrix elements are designed to minimize overhead information as well as to optimize the operation count. In this study, we utilize the notion of the compact diagonal storage method (CDM), which builds upon the previously developed diagonal storage—an orientation-independent uniform scheme to store the nonzero elements of a range of matrices. This study exploits both these storage schemes and presents efficient GPU-accelerated parallel implementations of matrix multiplication when the input matrices are banded and/or structured sparse. We exploit the data layouts in the diagonal storage schemes to expose a substantial amount of fine-grained parallelism and effectively utilize the GPU shared memory to improve the locality of data access for numerical calculations. Results from an extensive set of numerical experiments with the aforementioned types of matrices demonstrate orders-of-magnitude speedups compared with the sequential performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it