MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390824729 · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8631-6_24

Deep Neural Network for Prediction of Adsorbent Selectivity on Hydrogen Purification

2024· book-chapter· en· W4390824729 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer proceedings in physics · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAdsorptionSelectivityArtificial neural networkHydrogenChemistryComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With emergence of new materials, more and more materials are available for adsorption and separation processes. The adsorption selectivity of adsorbent to adsorbate is one of the important indicators in choosing materials. Because the adsorption experiment of the mixture is time-consuming and difficult, the selectivity of the adsorbent is generally calculated by the ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST). Taking the CO 2 /H 2 gas mixture as an example, this paper proposes a new adsorption selectivity calculation method based on a deep neural network (DNN) with 5 hidden layers, which takes the molar fraction of CO 2 , adsorption pressure and Langmuir adsorption isotherm parameters as the inputs of DNN. Combining the DNN and the NIST/ARPA-E database to quickly and accurately calculate the adsorption selectivity, the hydrogen purification and carbon dioxide storage materials can be quickly screened.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it