Heuristic approach for optimising reliable supply chain network using drones in last-mile delivery under uncertainty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addressing the challenges of last-mile logistics, the reliability of the supply chain network becomes paramount. These challenges are intensified due to drone performance limitations and various uncertainties in supply chain operations. While recent literature recognises the potential of drones for last-mile delivery, it falls short in effectively considering these uncertainties in drone-enabled supply chain models. Our research addresses this gap with two major contributions: first, a novel stochastic mixed-integer programming model is developed to construct a feasible delivery network, including warehouses and recharging stations, enhancing both coverage and reliability. Second, a modification in the genetic algorithm by considering each scenario independently improves computational efficiency, outperforming commercial software by an average of 40% and up to 55%. Empirical findings reveal that strategic investments in system hardening can yield substantial improvements in reliability. Despite the absence of real-world stochastic parameters as a limitation, this research pioneers the design of reliable networks under uncertainties and extends drone coverage through strategic charging stations. This work sets a significant milestone for future optimization in drone logistics, offering practical implications for supply chain managers considering drone adoption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it