MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390827460 · doi:10.1386/jcs_00094_1

A Museum for Future Fossils: On Curating Ecological Crisis in the Vernacular Museum

2023· article· en· W4390827460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curatorial Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthropoceneExhibitionVernacularMuseum informaticsMuseologyClimate changeAction (physics)Visual artsHistorySociologyEcologyEnvironmental ethicsArtLiteratureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Can a curatorial model based on radical pedagogy encourage action on climate change? To answer this question, this article critically reflects on A Museum for Future Fossils, an emergent and itinerant Malrauxian ‘museum without walls’ initiated by the authors in 2018, which is dedicated to thinking curatorially about the Anthropocene and the climate emergency. This ongoing vernacular museum includes undergraduate classes, art exhibitions, workshops, talks and a graduate summer school. By examining the potentials of land-based curatorial pedagogy through speculative museum text, we introduce a methodology of non-extractive exhibition-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it