V2VFormer: Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative Perception With Spatial-Channel Transformer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collaborative perception aims for a holistic perceptive construction by leveraging complementary information from nearby connected automated vehicle (CAV), thereby endowing the broader probing scope. Nonetheless, how to aggregate individual observation reasonably remains an open problem. In this paper, we propose a novel vehicle-to-vehicle perception framework dubbedV2VFormerwithTransformer-basedCollaboration (CoTr). Specifically. it re-calibrates feature importance according to position correlation via Spatial-Aware Transformer (SAT), and then performs dynamic semantic interaction with Channel-Wise Transformer (CWT). Of note,CoTris a light-weight and plug-in-play module that can be adapted seamlessly to the off-the-shelf 3D detectors with an acceptable computational overhead. Additionally, a large-scale cooperative perception dataset V2V-Set is further augmented with a variety of driving conditions, thereby providing extensive knowledge for model pretraining. Qualitative and quantitative experiments demonstrate our proposedV2VFormerachieves the state-of-the-art (SOTA) collaboration performance in both simulated and real-world scenarios, outperforming all counterparts by a substantial margin. We expect this would propel the progress of networked autonomous-driving research in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".