MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390839069 · doi:10.36347/sajp.2024.v13i01.002

Comparative Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Etoricoxib & Aceclofenac in Osteoarthritis Patients

2024· article· en· W4390839069 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sreerag J. Raj, Ms. Sheethal Kuriakose

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtoricoxibAceclofenacMedicineOsteoarthritisQuality of life (healthcare)Observational studyPhysical therapyFixed-dose combinationInternal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoarthritis (OA) is defined as a disorder that involves the movement of limbs characterized by cellular stress and a deterioration of the outer matrix that trigger malignant remodelling responses that include inflammatory mechanisms of natural immunity. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drugs are the first choice of treatment, since they reduce pain, improve functional ability. So, by comparing the effectiveness and safety of NSAID used in the treatment of OA can enhance the quality of life of patients. The goal of the study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of Aceclofenac and Etoricoxib in OA patients as well as to assess the quality of life (QOL) and medication adherence among subjects. It is an observational study conducted in the selected Orthopaedics clinics in T. Dasarahalli, Bengaluru District for a period of 6 months, based on various inclusion and exclusion criteria. Standardized questionnaire used in the study were Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and Morisky Medication-Taking Adherence Scale. The collected data were entered in Microsoft Excel and appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed. On comparing Aceclofenac and Etoricoxib in terms of WOMAC score Etoricoxib (28.42) was found to be more effective than Aceclofenac (31.61) while comparing Etoricoxib 60 mg and 90mg, 90 mg (26.22) was found to be more effective. Regarding the safety of these drugs, Etoricoxib was found to be safer than Aceclofenac in terms of side effects. On associating the QOL scores in both the groups, it was found that the subjects belonging to the Aceclofenac group had the highest overall mean score 57.68. Investigation of medication adherence in the study population revealed that out of 68 subject’s majority of them had shown low adherence (n=38). Because of its enhanced safety profile, Etoricoxib is a better option than Aceclofenac for treating .....

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Academic Journal of PharmacySame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207