MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Ice Flow Speed Variability of the Vaughn Lewis Icefall, SE Alaska, From Tiltmeters

2024· preprint· en· W4390841712 on OpenAlexaff
Sicely V Sohn, Galina Jonat, Juliana Souza‐Kasprzyk, Anne F Yoland, Emma Spezia, Keeya Beausoleil, K. L. Riverman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGlacierElevation (ballistics)TiltmeterClimatologyIce streamBedrockGeodesyMeteorologyGeomorphologyCryosphereSea iceAmplitudeGeographyGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Icefalls are steep ice flow features that form over steps in bedrock elevation. With their high driving stresses, icefalls have long been assumed to have a constant ice flowspeed. This assumption has not been thoroughly tested as methods using satellite feature tracking rapidly loose coherence and long-term GPS installations on the ground are unlikely to be retrievable. In this study, we test the hypothesis that the Vaughan Lewis Icefall in Southeast Alaska experiences daily velocity variations with daily variations in subglacial hydrology. Using high resolution tiltmeters, we observe change in ice surface tilt across eight days at two sites near the glacier centerline. We find daily variation in ice surface tilt, suggesting there are variations in daily ice flowspeed velocity. A weak and lagged correlation with air temperature suggests that velocity variations may be due to daily variations in subglacial hydrology. Future modeling efforts focused on describing ice flow over icefalls should consider adding daily or seasonal velocity variations. These results additionally have implications for theoretical models of ogive formation, which could result from seasonal flow speed variations across icefalls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→