Factors Affecting the Rice Yield During the Rainy Season Among Farmers in Southeastern Cambodia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A research study utilized the Cobb-Douglas production function to examine the elements influencing paddy production during the wet season in three rural provinces of Cambodia. This analysis was based on data gathered from a survey of farmers’ households conducted in 2022. The study discovered that the use of fertilizers and herbicides, the size of the family, and income from off-farm sources significantly impacted the output of wet-season paddy. A one percent increase in the use of fertilizer, herbicide, and family size resulted in an increase in rice output by 0.06 percent, 0.04 percent, and 0.05 percent respectively. Furthermore, a one percent increase in the age of the household head, hired labor, and off-farm income led to an increase in rice yield by 0.08 percent, 0.11 percent, and 0.05 percent respectively. The use of seeds, pesticides, household labor, and the education level of the household heads were found to enhance rice yields in southeastern Cambodia. However, these production relationships varied significantly across different regions. The study concluded that higher yields during the rainy season improved the effectiveness of paddy production, primarily due to the increased responsiveness to fertilizer application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".