MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390861989 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae061

<i>NuSTAR</i> and <i>Swift</i> observations of two supergiant fast X-ray transients: AX J1841.0−0536 and SAX J1818.6−1703

2024· article· en· W4390861989 on OpenAlexfundno aff
E. Bozzo, C. Ferrigno, P. Romano

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaUniversity of Leicester
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSupergiantNeutron starAstronomyCompact starStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Supergiant fast X-ray transients are wind-fed binaries hosting neutron star accretors, which display a peculiar variability in the X-ray domain. Different models have been proposed to explain this variability and the strength of the compact object magnetic field is generally considered a key parameter to discriminate among possible scenarios. We present here the analysis of two simultaneous observational campaigns carried out with Swift and NuSTAR targeting the supergiant fast X-ray transient sources AX J1841.0−0536 and SAX J1818.6−1703. A detailed spectral analysis is presented for both sources, with the main goal of hunting for cyclotron resonant scattering features that can provide a direct measurement of the neutron star magnetic field intensity. AX J1841.0−0536 was caught during the observational campaign at a relatively low flux. The source broad-band spectrum was featureless and could be well-described by using a combination of a hot blackbody and a power-law component with no measurable cut-off energy. In the case of SAX J1818.6−1703, the broad-band spectrum presented a relatively complex curvature which could be described by an absorbed cut-off power law (including both a cut-off and a folding energy) and featured a prominent edge at ∼7 keV, compatible with being associated to the presence of a ‘screen’ of neutral material partly obscuring the X-ray source. The fit to the broad-band spectrum also required the addition of a moderately broad (∼1.6 keV) feature centred at ∼14 keV. If interpreted as a cyclotron resonant scattering feature, our results would indicate for SAX J1818.6−1703 a relatively low-magnetized neutron star (∼1.2 × 1012 G).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→