Subharmonic resonance of phospholipid coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phospholipid encapsulated ultrasound contrast agents have proven to be a powerful addition in diagnostic imaging and show emerging applications in targeted therapy due to their resonant and nonlinear scattering. Microbubble response is affected by their intrinsic (e.g. bubble size, encapsulation physics) and extrinsic (e.g. boundaries) factors. One of the major intrinsic factors at play affecting microbubble vibration dynamics is the initial phospholipid packing of the lipid encapsulation. Here, we examine how the initial phospholipid packing affects the subharmonic response of either individual or a system of two closely-placed microbubbles. We employ a finite element model to investigate the change in subharmonic resonance under ‘small’ and ‘large’ radial excursions. For microbubbles ranging between 1.5 and 2.5 µm in diameter and in its elastic state (σ0 = 0.01 N/m), we demonstrate up to a 10 % shift towards lower frequencies in the peak subharmonic response as the radial excursion increases. However, for a bubble initially in its buckled state (σ0 = 0 N/m), we observe a maximum shift of 8 % towards higher frequencies as the radial excursion increases over the same range of bubble sizes – the opposite trend. We studied the same scenario for a system of two individual microbubbles for which we saw similar results. For microbubbles that are initially in their elastic sate, in both cases of a) two identically sized bubbles and b) a bubble in proximity to a smaller bubble, we observed a 6 % and 9 % shift towards lower frequencies respectively; while in the case of a neighboring larger bubble no change in subharmonic resonance frequency was observed. Microbubbles that are initially in a buckled state exert no change, 5 % and 19 % shift towards higher frequencies, in two-bubble systems consisting of a) same-size, b) smaller, and c) larger neighboring bubble respectively. Furthermore, we examined the effect of two adjacent bubbles with non-equal initial phospholipid states. The results presented here have important implications in ultrasound contrast agent applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".