MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390869424 · doi:10.1080/10714421.2023.2298648

Mobile phones as an autoethnographic resource for constructing modern gendered subjectivity

2024· article· en· W4390869424 on OpenAlex
Nancy Cook, David Butz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Communication Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Economy and Work Transformation
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubjectivityAutoethnographySociologyResource (disambiguation)Gender studiesAestheticsComputer scienceEpistemologyArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most research on the significance of new mobile phone infrastructure for communities in the global South tracks its developmental “impacts.” Our autoethnographic approach to this question rather draws on qualitative interviews to analyze how women in Shimshal, a rural village in northern Pakistan, employ mobile phones as a discursive resource for producing modern feminine subjectivity in a context of intensifying modernization and mobility system complexity. Shimshali women’s talk about mobile phones delineates this significance by representing themselves as firmly grounded in the reproductive sphere as responsible homemakers, childhood managers and organizers of multilocal households, and as embracing the modern values of self-development and gender equality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it