MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390870660 · doi:10.31223/x5h11s

Retrogressive thaw slump activity in the western Canadian Arctic (1984-2016)

2024· preprint· en· W4390870660 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Antoni G. Lewkowicz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsThermokarstArcticLandformPlateau (mathematics)Physical geographySlumpSedimentGeologyMorainePermafrostGeographyOceanographyGeomorphologyGlacierArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spatial distribution and links to climate of retrogressive thaw slump (RTS) activity over 32 years were examined using Google Earth Engine Timelapse videos for five areas in the western Canadian Arctic totalling 150 000 km2, each previously identified as having a high spatial concentration of these thermokarst landforms. Four spatial datasets run from 1984 to 2016 (Banks Island, northwest Victoria Island, Bluenose moraine, Paulatuk region), while the fifth starts in 2001 (Richardson Mountains / Peel Plateau). The total number of RTS active in the first four areas increased more than 50-fold, from 115 in 1984 to nearly 6000 in 2013. A further 573 RTS were active in this peak year in the Richardson Mountains / Peel Plateau. RTS developed most frequently adjacent to rivers (45%), with fewer on slopes (27%) or next to lakes (23%), and the smallest group at the coast (5%). However, there was considerable variation among the areas, and more than half in the Bluenose moraine and the Paulatuk region were initiated on lakeshores. High RTS initiations were linked to particularly warm summers, but once initiated, more than half of those RTS with long records remained active for more than 25 years. The impacts of this geomorphic activity included changes of colour in more than 500 lakes due to direct or indirect sediment inputs from RTS. The results show that the non-linear orders of magnitude increase from the 1980s to the 2010s previously reported for Banks Island extended across other ice-rich parts of the western Canadian Arctic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→