Spatial-Gated Multilayer Perceptron for Land Use and Land Cover Mapping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to its capacity to recognize detailed spectral differences, hyperspectral data have been extensively used for precise Land Use Land Cover (LULC) mapping. However, recent multi-modal methods have shown their superior classification performance over the algorithms that use single data sets. On the other hand, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are models extensively utilized for the hierarchical extraction of features. Vision transformers (ViTs), through a self-attention mechanism, have recently achieved superior modeling of global contextual information compared to CNNs. However, to harness their image classification strength, ViTs require substantial training datasets. In cases where the available training data is limited, current advanced multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) can provide viable alternatives to both deep CNNs and ViTs. In this paper, we developed the SGU-MLP, a deep learning algorithm that effectively combines MLPs and spatial gating units (SGUs) for precise Land Use Land Cover (LULC) mapping using multi-modal data from multi-spectral, LiDAR, and hyperspectral data. Results illustrated the superiority of the developed SGU-MLP classification algorithm over several CNN and CNN-ViT-based models, including HybridSN, ResNet, iFormer, EfficientFormer, and CoAtNet. The SGU-MLP classification model consistently outperformed the benchmark CNN and CNN-ViT-based algorithms. The code will be made publicly available at https: //github.com/aj1365/SGUMLP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".