Privacy-Preserving Anomaly Detection of Encrypted Smart Contract for Blockchain-Based Data Trading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a blockchain-based data trading platform, data users can purchase data sets and computing power through encrypted smart contracts. The security of smart contracts is important as it relates to that of the data platform. However, due to the inability to apply to detection rules with complex structures and the inefficiency of detection, existing malicious code detection methods are not suitable for the encrypted smart contracts in blockchain-based data trading platforms with high transaction rate requirements. In this paper, a practical and privacy-preserving malicious code detection method is proposed for encrypted smart contract in blockchain-based data trading platform. Specifically, we design two kinds of miners to act as the malicious rule processor and the detector respectively for inspecting the encrypted smart contract. The rule processor generates an obfuscated map with the original open-source malicious rule set. The detector performs a malicious inspection algorithm by inputting the obfuscated map and the randomized tokens, where the latter is generated from smart contract. Then, we theoretically analyze the security syntax of the proposed method. The analysis results demonstrate the proposed scheme can achieve$\mathcal {L}$-secure against adaptive attacks. Extensive experiments are carried out through the open-source real rule sets, which show that the proposed scheme can reduce communication time and communication overhead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".