MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390874192 · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00805

SlaBins: Fisheye Depth Estimation using Slanted Bins on Road Environments

2023· article· en· W4390874192 on OpenAlexaff
Jong-Sung Lee, Gyeongsu Cho, Jeongin Park, Kyongjun Kim, Jung Hee Kim, Seong-Gyun Jeong, Kyungdon Joo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceDepth mapDistortion (music)MonocularPoint cloudPixelObject (grammar)Point (geometry)Image (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although 3D perception for autonomous vehicles has focused on frontal-view information, more than half of fatal accidents occur due to side impacts in practice (e.g., T-bone crash). Motivated by this fact, we investigate the problem of side-view depth estimation, especially for monocular fisheye cameras, which provide wide FoV information. However, since fisheye cameras head road areas, it observes road areas mostly and results in severe distortion on object areas, such as vehicles or pedestrians. To alleviate these issues, we propose a new fisheye depth estimation network, SlaBins, that infers an accurate and dense depth map based on a geometric property of road environments; most objects are standing (i.e., orthogonal) on the road environments. Concretely, we introduce a slanted multi-cylindrical image (MCI) representation, which allows us to describe a distance as a radius to a cylindrical layer orthogonal to the ground regardless of the camera viewing direction. Based on the slanted MCI, we estimate a set of adaptive bins and a per-pixel probability map for depth estimation. Then by combining it with the estimated slanted angle of viewing direction, we directly infer a dense and accurate depth map for fisheye cameras. Experiments demonstrate that SlaBins outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in both qualitative and quantitative evaluation on the SynWoodScape and KITTI-360 depth datasets. For more information, you can visit our project page https://syniez.github.io/SlaBins/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207