MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390876783 · doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v9i3.1287

Beyond Weber: Social Change between Disenchantment and Rationalization Processes in Plural Communities

2023· article· en· W4390876783 on OpenAlex
Pedro Caetano, Stefánia Toma, Thomas Kemple, María Manuela Mendes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersections · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWeber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisenchantmentPluralRationalization (economics)SociologyEpistemologyEconomic geographyPolitical scienceLinguisticsPhilosophyGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Weberian approach to social actionMore than a century after Max Weber, the issue of axiological neutrality, or in Weber's terms 'value-freedom' in the social sciences, is once again being raised with exceptional acuteness in the realm of education.The freedom to research, publish, teach, and learn a variety of subjects stemming from different and sometimes conflicting value spheres is being hotly contested.For instance, in Palm Beach, Florida, a teacher's contract was suspended 'after complaints that he was indoctrinating students during his lectures on racial justice' (Pelletier et al., 2023).Consequently, 'Gov.Ron DeSantis signed legislation ordering Florida state colleges to publicly share the textbooks and instructional materials required for "at least 95 percent of courses" offered in an academic term ' (Pelletier et al., 2023).This measure, in practice supported by the Individual Freedom Act, also known as the 'Stop WOKE Act', amounts to 'unconstitutional classroom censorship that restricts teachers and students from learning about and discussing race and gender' (Woodward, 2022).Politicians like DeSantis not only try to dictate which among countless thematic subjects should be open to critical reflection and regarded as socially relevant for students' academic development; they also decide which perspectives should be privileged for discussion in the classroom.Indeed, 'he accused the university of betraying its values-based mission by being "complacent" on an important topic like race' (Marcus, 2023) under the pretext that it was politically motivated by woke culture (Marcus, 2023).This stance decidedly contradicts Max Weber's staunch support for 'ethical passion for academic freedom' (Shields, 1949, p. v;Wessely, 2011), which he understood as valuefreedom (Wertfreiheit) in research and the freedom to teach and learn (Lehrfreiheit and Lernfreiheit) in the classroom; it also runs counter to his emphasis on preserving intellectual integrity and objectivity in the social sciences (Kemple, 2023).In fact, as Shields points out (1949, p. ix), Weber contributed to clarifying the problem of conflating 'the false identification of an apolitical attitude with scientific integrity,' and his arguments should help us 'to refute the unfounded charge that the social sciences are ethically relativistic or nihilistic in either their logical implications or their empirical consequences.'However, Weber would not be surprised by these positions.He believed that 'the "points of view," which are orientated towards "values," from which we consider cultural

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it