MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390883990 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3850938/v1

The corrosion behavior of electroless Ni-P coatings in concentrated KOH electrolyte

2024· preprint· en· W4390883990 on OpenAlexafffund
Anqiang He, Hang Hu, Drew Aasen, Douglas G. Ivey

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTafel equationCorrosionElectrolyteMaterials scienceElectrochemistryCoatingMetallurgyScanning electron microscopeInorganic chemistryChemistryElectrodeComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ni-P has been widely used as a protective coating for many substrates. The corrosion resistance of Ni-P in neutral solutions such as NaCl, or acidic electrolytes such as HCl and H2SO4, has been extensively studied. However, the corrosion behavior of Ni-P coatings in caustic media, such as KOH, has received much less attention. Typically, corrosion behavior is studied through the use of electrochemical methods with corrosion rates determined from corrosion currents and potentials measured from Tafel curves. In this work, the corrosion rates of Ni-P coatings, with P concentrations varying from 2 to 11 wt%, in highly alkaline KOH (11 M) are obtained directly through electron microscopy measurements of cross sections and subsequent correlation with electrochemical data. Phosphorus concentration affects the corrosion rate; corrosion rate increases with increasing P content, peaks out at about 6–8 wt% P, and then decreases with any further increase in P content. This behavior is correlated to internal stress levels developed in the coatings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207