The Cross-Scale Association between Pathomics and Radiomics Features in Immunotherapy-Treated NSCLC Patients: A Preliminary Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in cancer biomarker development have led to a surge of distinct data modalities, such as medical imaging and histopathology. To develop predictive immunotherapy biomarkers, these modalities are leveraged independently, despite their orthogonality. This study aims to explore the cross-scale association between radiological scans and digitalized pathology images for immunotherapy-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: This study involves 36 NSCLC patients who were treated with immunotherapy and for whom both radiology and pathology images were available. A total of 851 and 260 features were extracted from CT scans and cell density maps of histology images at different resolutions. We investigated the radiopathomics relationship and their association with clinical and biological endpoints. We used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) method to test the differences between the distributions of correlation coefficients with the two imaging modality features. Unsupervised clustering was done to identify which imaging modality captures poor and good survival patients. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated a significant correlation between cell density pathomics and radiomics features. Furthermore, we also found a varying distribution of correlation values between imaging-derived features and clinical endpoints. The KS test revealed that the two imaging feature distributions were different for PFS and CD8 counts, while similar for OS. In addition, clustering analysis resulted in significant differences in the two clusters generated from the radiomics and pathomics features with respect to patient survival and CD8 counts. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest a cross-scale association between CT scans and pathology H&E slides among ICI-treated patients. These relationships can be further explored to develop multimodal immunotherapy biomarkers to advance personalized lung cancer care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".