MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390886077 · doi:10.1522/revueot.v32n3.1689

Gaëlle Généreux, chargée de projet, Territoires innovants en économie sociale et solidaire (TIESS)

2024· article· fr· W4390886077 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Anaïs Del Bono, Emmanuel Raufflet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Organisations & territoires · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

de projetTerritoires innovants en économie sociale et solidaire (TIESS) Titulaire d'un baccalauréat en anthropologie et d'une maîtrise en gestion de l'innovation sociale, Gaëlle Généreux est convaincue que les projets collectifs et participatifs peuvent être de véritables moteurs de transformation territoriale et d'inclusion sociale.C'est avec cette vision qu'elle a cofondé et dirigé la Coopérative de solidarité Temps libre, un lieu unique alliant cotravail et espace citoyen situé dans le quartier Mile End, à Montréal.Après avoir coordonné durant quatre ans un programme de soutien à l'entrepreneuriat pour un organisme public et avoir enseigné cette discipline comme chargée de cours, elle retourne à ses premiers amours : l'entrepreneuriat collectif.Elle appuie des initiatives qui contribueront à la transition socioécologique grâce à l'économie circulaire au sein de Territoires innovants en économie sociale et solidaire (TIESS). Merci beaucoup, Madame Généreux, de donner cet entretien à la revue Organisations & territoires. Pouvez-vous nous présenter TIESS, que vous avez rejoint il y a deux ans et demi?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Organisations & territoiresSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207