Quelles stratégies pédagogiques participent au développement de la compétence scripturale? Atelier délibératif mené avec des enseignantes de français d'expérience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quelles stratgies pdagogiques participent au dveloppement de la comptence scripturale ? Atelier dlibratif men avec des enseignantes de franais d'exprience Formation et profession 31(2) 2023 1 sum Les savoirs issus de la recherche sur les stratgies pdagogiques utilises en classe de franais au secondaire qubcois qui participent particulirement au dveloppement de la comptence scripturale des lves sont lacunaires et difficilement comparables. Pour clairer ces savoirs, nous puisons dans le savoir d' exprience des enseignantes et enseignants (Tardif et Lessard, 1999) en menant un atelier dlibratif (Dogba, Dossa et Dagenais, 2017) avec six enseignantes d' exprience, l'issue duquel trois ensembles de stratgies pdagogiques sont retenus : montrer des exemples de textes ou de stratgies d' criture; faire crire (plus); offrir des rtroactions varies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it