MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390893554 · doi:10.1038/s41408-024-00978-z

Translocation t(14;16) in multiple myeloma: gangster or just part of the gang?

2024· editorial· en· W4390893554 on OpenAlexafffund
Hira Mian, Martin Kaiser, Rafaël Fonseca

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Cancer Journal · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Cancer InstituteHamilton Health Sciences FoundationHamilton Health Sciences
KeywordsChromosomal translocationMultiple myelomaMedicineInternal medicineBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is with great interest that we read the article by Schavgoulidze et al. proposing a lack of prognostic significance of the translocation t(14;16) amongst newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) [ 1 ]. As previously reported by others, they show t(14;16) was commonly present with other progression genetic events such as deletion 17p, gain/amp 1q and deletion 1p32. The authors conclude that only t(14;16) associated with other concurrent genetic progression abnormalities should be considered high-risk. Here we argue that t(14;16): (1) should continue to be considered high-risk regardless, and (2) continue to be routinely included in test profiles that identify high-risk subgroups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood Cancer JournalSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207