Accessory genes define species-specific routes to antibiotic resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A deeper understanding of the relationship between the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene carriage and phenotype is necessary to develop effective response strategies against this global burden. AMR phenotype is often a result of multi-gene interactions; therefore, we need approaches that go beyond current simple AMR gene identification tools. Machine-learning (ML) methods may meet this challenge and allow the development of rapid computational approaches for AMR phenotype classification. To examine this, we applied multiple ML techniques to 16,950 bacterial genomes across 28 genera, with corresponding MICs for 23 antibiotics with the aim of training models to accurately determine the AMR phenotype from sequenced genomes. This resulted in a >1.5-fold increase in AMR phenotype prediction accuracy over AMR gene identification alone. Furthermore, we revealed 528 unique (often species-specific) genomic routes to antibiotic resistance, including genes not previously linked to the AMR phenotype. Our study demonstrates the utility of ML in predicting AMR phenotypes across diverse clinically relevant organisms and antibiotics. This research proposes a rapid computational method to support laboratory-based identification of the AMR phenotype in pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".