MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390907187 · doi:10.18254/s207054760029596-2

Canadian investments in Russia in 2014–2023

2023· article· en· W4390907187 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Evgeny Khoroshilov

Bibliographic record

VenueRussia and America in the 21st Century · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRussian federationMultinational corporationRussian economyBalance sheetInvestment (military)BusinessBalance (ability)AgricultureBalance of tradeCapital (architecture)Service (business)International tradeEconomic policyEconomyEconomicsFinancePolitical sciencePoliticsEconomic systemGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines investment flows between Russia and Canada in 2014–2023. The analysis of the activities of Canadian multinational companies in the Russian Federation under the conditions of the economic war declared by the United States and its allies to Russia is carried out. It is indicated that until 2022, Canadian capital in Russia was concentrated in such industries as mining, vehicle engineering, agriculture and food industry, retail trade and services. It is shown that to date, almost all Canadian TNCs that owned business in Russia have withdrawn from their Russian assets. The exception were two corporations operating in the service sector. It is concluded that the damage caused to the Russian economy by the departure of Canadian investors seems insignificant, since most of their enterprises have passed into new hands and continue to operate. It is estimated that the balance sheet loss on direct investments recognized by TNCs and institutional investors from Canada in connection with the withdrawal from the Russian Federation amounted to about USD 1,3 billion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussia and America in the 21st CenturySame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207