Prediction of antigen-responding VHH antibodies by tracking the evolution of antibody along the time course of immunization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antibody maturation is the central function of the adaptive immune response. This process is driven by the repetitive selection of mutations that increase the affinity toward antigens. We hypothesized that a precise observation of this process by high-throughput sequencing along the time course of immunization will enable us to predict the antibodies reacting to the immunized antigen without any additional in vitro screening. An alpaca was immunized with IgG fragments using multiple antigen injections, and the antibody repertoire development was traced via high-throughput sequencing periodically for months. The sequences were processed into clusters, and the antibodies in the 16 most abundant clusters were generated to determine whether the clusters included antigen-binding antibodies. The sequences of most antigen-responsive clusters resembled those of germline cells in the early stages. These sequences were observed to accumulate significant mutations and also showed a continuous sequence turnover throughout the experimental period. The foregoing characteristics gave us >80% successful prediction of clusters composed of antigen-responding VHHs against IgG fragment. Furthermore, when the prediction method was applied to the data from other alpaca immunized with epidermal growth factor receptor, the success rate exceeded 80% as well, confirming the general applicability of the prediction method. Superior to previous studies, we identified the immune-responsive but very rare clusters or sequences from the immunized alpaca without any empirical screening data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".