Chiral Multidentate Ligand Facilitating Perovskite Nanocrystals with Circularly Polarized Luminescence and Chiral Assembly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chiral ligand modification has emerged as a promising route to confer intrinsic chirality in perovskite nanocrystals (NCs), thereby imparting them with optically active properties and rendering great superiority in the next generation of circularly polarized luminescence. However, the functionalization of chiral ligand is not fully explored and the underlying mechanism governing chirality transfer remains elusive. Herein, tryptophan (Try), a naturally occurring chiral amino acid, is verified to serve as multidentate chiral ligands attaching on the surface of perovskite NCs. Such strong coordination favors the chirality imprinting on the electronic state of CsPbBr3, resulting in notable circular dichroism features and circularly polarized luminescence with a maximum glum of 2.3 × 10−3. It is intriguing that the intermolecular interaction between Try ligands anchored on two neighboring NCs contribute to chiral optical properties as well. The RDG‐NCI analysis have confirmed the hydrogen bond between the amine and carboxylic groups on chiral Try, which may drive the chiral assembly of perovskite NCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".