MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390917646 · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357788

Editorial: Methods & applications in theoretical and philosophical psychology: research methods in the study of consciousness

2024· editorial· en· W4390917646 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gillie Gabay, Douglas A. MacDonald, Melanie G. Rosen

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsciousnessPsychologyPhilosophy of psychologyFront (military)Cognitive scienceEpistemologyPsychoanalysisPhilosophyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The five articles that comprise the Research Topic were written by scholars from nine countries (i.e., Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, UK, and US) and embody a range of contemporary research foci and methods. Walter and Hinterberger discuss the notion of self-organized criticality (SOC), which is a way of improving system performance through the ability of a complex systems to undergo a second-order phase transition. They consider the possibility of SOC as a core property of the nervous system which hold the potential to offer a neurodynamic framework for understanding consciousness. To to assess this view, they performed a review of the available literature on SOC and discuss the array of applied methodologies employed in empirical research. They found that SOC indeed aligns with modern influential theories of consciousness.Nayak and Griffiths completed an investigation about psychedelic experiences. Using traditional survey methods, they aimed at exploring how these experiences influence people's beliefs about consciousness and, in particular, their attributions of consciousness to different objects and life forms. Their findings suggest that psychedelics induce powerful alterations of consciousness that do impact how people understand the world around them, but in ways that may appear counter-intuitive. Individuals increase their attribution of consciousness to animals and inanimate objects, and surprisingly, these effects remained for extended periods of time, showing the effect in a survey taken years after the experience.Alcaraz-Sánchez et al analyzed minimal forms of awareness during sleep using microphenomenological interview, a technique that allows subjects to better focus on their experiences, along with several forms of qualitative analysis (e.g., phenomenological analysis, grounded theory, thematic analysis). The aim of their study was to identify the characteristics of objectless awareness during sleep. They identified an experiential phase of sleep simply called the "nothingness phase" that has unique features. This phase significantly reduced sense of self and physical embodiment, unfocused attention and involved an absence of visual imagery. The nothingness phase can be described as conscious awareness that lacks any content to the experience.Orianne and Eustache undertook a detailed analysis of the concept of collective memory. Their article focused on the history of collective memory and described a current conflation with other memory concepts such as shared, collaborative, and social memory.The authors argued that collective memory, unlike social memory, is not a type of memory of a collective group. Instead, collective memory concerns a system of consciousness at the individual level which can be linked to social memory through communications with social groups and other social interactions.Last, Trakas offered a critical discussion of a spatial model of memory called mental time travel (MMT). MTT has come to be applied to the conscious experience of remembering in that memory allows us to travel back in time. Drawing from the philosophical literature on time travel, Trakas tackles issues of both the ontology and phenomenal experience of MTT. A main goal of this article is to shed light on the distinct features that MMT in relation to memory. She draws on philosophical theories of time to elucidate the concept of MTT and evaluate its use a metaphor for remembering.One novel and valuable feature of this collection is the diversity of nationalities, research foci, and methods reflected in these papers. This research makes apparent that scientific inquiry into consciousness is still very much in its nascent stages while at the same time drawing attention to the potential of cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary collaboration.The editors of this special issue are of the conviction that a consilience of knowledge on consciousness could be, and should be, facilitated through the integration of theories and methods that have traditionally been kept separate and embraced by investigators from different disciplines. One currently available approach to inquiry that seems to offer such integration is neurophenomenology. This field of research reflects attempts to bring together the study of experience, cognition, and culture by interweaving phenomenology and neuroscience methods. This field of research reflects attempts to bring together the study of experience, cognition, and culture by interweaving phenomenology and neuroscience methods (see Laughlin & Rock, 2013 for an excellent overview of the history and cognitive and cultural forms of this exciting approach). Although we are confident that readers will find each of the articles in this collection interesting in its own right, we hope that this article collection will inspire scholars to seek out and develop new integrative methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.071
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.071
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.005
Bibliometrics0.0100.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0170.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Psychology→Same topicPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment→French-language works237,207→