MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A phase-based account of Mandarin third tone sandhi domains

2012· article· en· W4390926516 on OpenAlexaff
Ya Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersStrong
KeywordsMandarin ChineseComputer scienceTone (literature)SyllablePhase (matter)SyntaxNatural language processingDomain (mathematical analysis)LinguisticsPhonologyArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionMathematicsPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present paper argues for an account of Mandarin Third Tone Sandhi (T3S) domains in terms of phase-based syntaxphonology mapping.Given the phase-based architecture of the grammar, a T3S domain is assumed to include everything inside a phase (XP), excluding material at the phase edge (the head X and Specifier).Unlike previous prosody based accounts of T3S domains, the phase based account does not require domain formation to satisfy two conditions, the immediate constituency and the syllable count, because they are automatically satisfied as each phase is built up and spelt out before T3S can apply.In order for the phase based analysis of T3S domains to work, however, the minimalist understanding of Mandarin syntactic structures is required.In other words, direct syntax-phonology mapping in T3S domain formation is possible only within the minimalist framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhonetics and Phonology Research→French-language works237,207→