Hereditary Amino Acid Metabolism Disorders and Urea Cycle Disorders: to Practicing Physician
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hereditary amino acid metabolism disorders (aminoacidopathies) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of hereditary metabolic diseases caused by enzymes deficiency involved in amino acid metabolism, that finally leads to progressive damage of central nervous system, liver, kidneys, and other organs and systems. Hereditary urea cycle disorders occur because of enzyme deficiency leading to impaired urea synthesis and hyperammoniemia in patients. The age of disease onset and clinical manifestations severity range from milder, intermittent forms to severe, manifesting in the first hours of life. Expanded neonatal screening (implemented in Russian Federation at 01.01.2023) allows to diagnose diseases from these groups in the first days of life, to prescribe timely pathogenetic therapy. Altogether it helps to prevent the development of disease severe complications. Raising awareness about hereditary aminoacidopathies and urea cycle disorders among pediatricians, neonatologists, neurologists, gastroenterologists, ophthalmologists is a topical issue of modern pediatrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".