LA METÁFORA DEL HAMBRE EN LA POESÍA DE ANNE CARSON: UNA POÉTICA DE LA INCORRECCIÓN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La obra de la canadiense Anne Carson plantea nuevos retos a nuestro modo de entender la poesía. En este artículo se propone un acercamiento a su poética a partir de algunas de las ideas teóricas que podemos rastrear en sus ensayos, entrevistas y poemas. De manera más específica, se estudian problemas literarios como la metáfora, la hibridación de géneros o el papel del sujeto en el poema a la luz de lo que aquí llamamos una poética de la incorrección, desarrollada principalmente en su poema ensayístico “Essay on What I Think About Most”. En particular, se explora cómo se presentan estas cuestiones en su poesía a través del análisis intracomparatístico y de la interpretación de la metáfora del hambre como mecanismo poético que solapa de forma sinestésica las experiencias del cuerpo y de la mente, dos planos semióticos tradicionalmente separados y opuestos. Abstract: The oeuvre of Canadian writer Anne Carson poses new challenges to our understanding of poetry. This article approaches Carson’s poetics by discussing some theoretical ideas that can be traced in her essays, interviews, and poems. More specifically, this paper addresses literary questions such as metaphor, genre hybridization, and the role of the subject in the poem, in the light of what we call here a poetics of wrongness, which is developed mainly in her poem “Essay on What I Think About Most”. We explore these issues by means of intracomparative analysis which leads us to interpret the metaphor of hunger as a figure that combines through synaesthesia bodily and mental experiences, two traditionally separate and opposed semiotic realms. Keywords: Anne Carson. Poetry and poetics. Mistake. Metaphor. Body and subject.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".