How signals propagate in neuronal compartments? Insights from the Poisson-Nernst Planck model.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of novel experimental techniques such as dendritic patch-clamp recordings or genetically-encoded Ca2+-indicators have made the activity of the dendritic tree considerably more tractable, challenging the old postulate that dendrites serve mainly to connect neurons and to convey information with no specific role in synaptic plasticity. Hence, how the dendritic tree transforms synaptic input into neuronal output and defines the relationships between active synapses is now a leading question in neuroscience. To understand the specific role of dendrites, dendritic spines and dendritic tree geometry in shaping neuronal signal, a crucial first step is to understand precisely voltage and ionic dynamics in such small neuronal compartments. For this purpose, we use the Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) model, which is the recognized standard for modeling voltage dynamics and ionic electrodiffusion in electrolytes at the scale now reached by experimental techniques. This non-linear model presents significant challenges for both modeling and simulation due to its high concentration gradients and sensitivity to boundary conditions, making it difficult to simulate on complex geometries. We resolve these issues here by using a state-of-the-art finite volume method, the Discrete-Duality Finite Volume method, which we previously developed to simulate the PNP system of equations on various two-dimensional geometries representing neuronal compartments. Using this method, we investigate the propagation and attenuation of an ionic influx coming from a synapse near a dendritic branch bifurcation and at a dendritic spine, as well as signal invasion in the nearby branches and spines. By connecting these compartments to an ionic reservoir representing the dendritic shaft, we observe that the distance to the shaft strongly influences signal propagation. Notably, a spine positioned close to a large branch behaves as an isolated compartment, while a distant spine is susceptible to signal invasion. Our numerical results therefore suggest that the local geometry of the dendritic tree has a major influence on spine behavior. Consequently, this study proposes that synaptic plasticity rules would differ depending on the location of the spine on the tree, meaning that plasticity occurs not only at the spine level, but also across the entire dendritic tree architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".