MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390937016 · doi:10.1090/mcom/3943

Few hamiltonian cycles in graphs with one or two vertex degrees

2024· article· en· W4390937016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Computation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalDawson College
FundersKU LeuvenFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVlaamse regeringJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceOnderzoeksraad, KU LeuvenVlaams Supercomputer Centrum
KeywordsVertex (graph theory)CombinatoricsHamiltonian (control theory)Hamiltonian pathMathematicsHamiltonian path problemGraphMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by Sheehan’s conjecture that no <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="4"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">4</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -regular graph contains exactly one hamiltonian cycle, we prove results on hamiltonian cycles in regular graphs and nearly regular graphs. We fully disprove a conjecture of Haythorpe on the minimum number of hamiltonian cycles in regular hamiltonian graphs, thereby extending a result of Zamfirescu, as well as correct and complement Haythorpe’s computational enumerative results from [Exp. Math. <bold>27</bold> (2018), no. 4, 426–430]. Thereafter, we use the Lovász Local Lemma to extend Thomassen’s independent dominating set method. This extension allows us to find a second hamiltonian cycle that inherits linearly many edges from the first hamiltonian cycle. Regarding the limitations of this method, we answer a question of Haxell, Seamone, and Verstraete, and settle the first open case of a problem of Thomassen by showing that for <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="k element-of StartSet 5 comma 6 EndSet"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ∈ </mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">k \in \{5, 6\}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> there exist infinitely many <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="k"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">k</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -regular hamiltonian graphs having no independent dominating set with respect to a prescribed hamiltonian cycle. Motivated by an observation of Aldred and Thomassen, we prove that for every <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="kappa element-of StartSet 2 comma 3 EndSet"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi> κ </mml:mi> <mml:mo> ∈ </mml:mo> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">{</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\kappa \in \{ 2, 3 \}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> and any positive integer <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="k"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">k</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , there are infinitely many non-regular graphs of connectivity <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="kappa"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> κ </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\kappa</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> containing exactly one hamiltonian cycle and in which every vertex has degree <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="3"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">3</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> or <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="2 k"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">2k</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it