MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390937797 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2023-0409

A new mathematical model for the estimation of shear modulus for unsaturated compacted soils

2024· article· en· W4390937797 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qian Zhai, Ruize Zhang, Harianto Rahardjo, Alfrendo Satyanaga, Guoliang Dai, Weiming Gong, Xueliang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEnterprise Community Partners
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringShear modulusDegree of saturationSaturation (graph theory)Soil waterModulusGeologyMathematicsSoil scienceMaterials scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small-strain shear modulus ( G) is an essential parameter for many geotechnical analyses. Most of shallow foundations are constructed in an unsaturated soil and the shear modulus of the unsaturated soil fluctuates because of the precipitation, evaporation, and rising of ground water table. In this paper, a new mathematical model is proposed for the estimation of the shear modulus function, Gunsat, which defines the relationship between small-strain modulus of unsaturated soil and matric suction. In the proposed model, the soil-water characteristic curve in the form of the degree of saturation is used as the input information. There are additional two parameters named n and C, which can be calibrated with the experimental data, are adopted in the proposed model. The estimated results show good agreement with the experimental data from literature. The proposed method can be used to track the tendency of Gunsat and minimize the data points from the laboratory tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207