MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390938916 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3351772

Proactive Bandwidth Allocation for V2X Networks With Multi-Attentional Deep Graph Learning

2024· article· en· W4390938916 on OpenAlexafffund
Chenglong Wang, Jun Peng, Lin Cai, Weirong Liu, Shuo Li, Hu He, Zhiwu Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceDynamic bandwidth allocationBandwidth (computing)Bandwidth allocationComputer networkThroughputWirelessWireless networkSpectrum managementReal-time computingDistributed computingTelecommunicationsCognitive radio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing number of connected vehicles exacerbates the scarcity of spectrum resources in vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication. To optimize the utilization of wireless resources, it is crucial to allocate the limited spectrum blocks to each roadside unit (RSU) based on the real-time bandwidth demand of vehicles within their coverage. However, the complex mobility patterns of vehicles and dynamic traffic conditions make it challenging to accurately and promptly estimate the bandwidth demand. To address this issue, a spatial-temporal multi-attentional network (STMA-net) is designed to predict the future bandwidth demand of RSUs. Based on the predicted bandwidth demand, a prediction error-compensable proactive bandwidth allocation algorithm is proposed to adaptively allocate spectrum resources and narrow the discrepancy between predicted and actual demand. Experimental results with realistic traffic in Bologna demonstrate that the proposed STMA-net achieves 11.25% higher prediction accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, the proposed proactive bandwidth allocation method outperforms existing methods, providing the highest throughput and serving 5% more vehicles while reducing the service drop rate by an order of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207