Monitoring rock movement and—controlling ore loss and dilution associated with blasting at Geita and North Mara Gold mines, Tanzania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT We present findings from a blast movement monitoring research conducted as a part of mine to mill campaign at the Geita Gold Mine—and additional data from blast monitoring practices at North Mara Gold Mine. These include measurement of the blast-induced rock movement and perimeter translation after blast derived from a blast shot at Nyankanga pit (Geita Gold Mine) and three other shots at the Nyabirama pit (North Mara Gold Mine). Using Blast Movement Technology, 34 movement-monitoring balls installed in 13 blast-monitoring boreholes made possible estimation of the average vertical and horizontal ore movements in the studied blast shots. Recorded ore movement estimates average horizontal and vertical movements of 3.69 and 1.56 m, respectively, at the Nyabirama pit and average horizontal and vertical movements of 4.5 and 2.48 m, respectively, at the Nyankanga pit. Based on the estimated material movements, zones of ore losses and dilution are established and new dig lines are proposed from successful ore block translation in all blast shots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".