Development of a small-scale geotechnical centrifuge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oil sand fluid fine tailings in northern Alberta have very poor water-release characteristics and require many decades to fully consolidate under their own weight. Generally, physical and/or chemical treatments are necessary to improve the consolidation behaviour and manage the tailings in an economical and environmentally acceptable manner. The effect of each treatment method is commonly evaluated, in part, by measuring the short- and long-term consolidation behaviour of treated samples. Geotechnical beam centrifuges, large-strain consolidation apparatus and geocolumns are typically used to measure the consolidation properties. However, these methods require many months to complete or are expensive and difficult to deploy in the field. A small-scale geotechnical centrifuge suitable for use in both research environments and laboratories at industrial sites was developed to study and/or monitor various treatment and disposal options in a short time. This paper presents the motivation for developing a small-scale centrifuge, the components and features of the centrifuge and the assortment of tests completed to validate the apparatus and testing methods. The validation tests proved that the small-scale centrifuge produces comparable results with existing methods while reducing the cost and time required to evaluate the consolidation performance of different tailings treatment options.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".