MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390955519 · doi:10.1051/shsconf/202418103002

Study on China’s Position on Its Strategic Location, Planning, and Future Outline

2024· article· en· W4390955519 on OpenAlexaff
Zerun Ai

Bibliographic record

VenueSHS Web of Conferences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaRenewable energyBusinessPosition (finance)ElectricityDominance (genetics)Greenhouse gasGovernment (linguistics)CoalEnvironmental economicsIndustrial organizationNatural resource economicsEconomicsFinanceEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This comprehensive analysis highlights the potential of China, the world’s largest energy producer. The research paper provides direction to China in the energy sector. Although currently relying on coal for power generation, in the long term, the country will become the largest exporter of electricity. The transition to sustainable energy production is critical, considering global commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Paris Agreement. China’s ability to shift to clean energy is strengthened by its vast labor force, financial strength, and the Chinese government’s commitment to national rejuvenation. By establishing an “Electro-Yuan” system for trading electricity, China could challenge the global dominance of the US dollar. The One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative further facilitates a clean electricity trade network with strategic partners worldwide. However, a successful transition hinges on shifting from coal to renewable energy sources, enhancing existing grid infrastructure for cross-border transmission, and effectively implementing the Electro-Yuan system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHS Web of ConferencesSame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207