MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390963491 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.15051

The Norm Functor over Schemes

2024· preprint· en· W4390963491 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Gille, Erhard Neher, Cameron Ruether

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunctorMathematicsMorphismNorm (philosophy)Pure mathematicsEquivalence (formal languages)Stack (abstract data type)EmbeddingMorita equivalenceRank (graph theory)Ext functorAlgebra over a fieldFunctor categoryCombinatoricsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We construct a globalization of Ferrand's norm functor over rings which generalizes it to the setting of a finite locally free morphism of schemes $T\to S$ of constant rank. It sends quasi-coherent modules over $T$ to quasi-coherent modules over $S$. These functors restrict to the category of quasi-coherent algebras. We also assemble these functors into a norm morphism from the stack of quasi-coherent modules over a finite locally free of constant rank extension of the base scheme into the stack of quasi-coherent modules. This morphism also restricts to the analogous stacks of algebras. Restricting our attention to finite étale covers, we give a cohomological description of the norm morphism in terms of the Segre embedding. Using this cohomological description, we show that the norm gives an equivalence of stacks of algebras $A_1^2 \equiv D_2$, akin to the result shown in The Book of Involutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207