MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Silicon Photomultiplier-based Low-light in vivo Fiber Photometry

2023· article· en· W4390970743 on OpenAlexaff
Mahrokh Namazi, Govind Peringod, Anupam Bisht, Jaideep S. Bains, Grant R. Gordon, Kartikeya Murari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotomultiplierPhotometry (optics)Optical fiberMaterials scienceSilicon photomultiplierSiliconOpticsOptoelectronicsPhysicsDetectorAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber photometry is an important tool for studying neural activity in freely moving animals. Existing systems utilize photodetectors requiring a high bias voltage or high optical power. The former results in expensive bulky systems and the latter leads to photobleaching or phototoxicity. We present a low-light fiber photometry system for recording neural activity in mice. Employing a sensitive silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) allows the use of low excitation light without requiring high-voltage power supplies. Isosbestic wavelength control was implemented to correct for motion artifacts. The same control signal was used as a novel method for SiPM gain correction, eliminating the need for additional sensors and control mechanisms. An off-the-shelf impedance measurement integrated circuit was used to simplify the electronics for homodyne detection of light. Sensitivity, dynamic range, and robustness to artifacts were characterized by measurement of fluorescence in fluorescein solutions. In vivo measurements during footshock experiments validated the system’s effectiveness at 2.3 μW excitation power. The system’s power requirements show promise for miniaturization and animal-mountable configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207