MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Places of Worship in Britain and Ireland, 1829–1929

2024· article· en· W4390972734 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorshipHistoryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Rewley House Studies in the Historic Environment have established a track record of publishing the valuable papers given at conferences on architectural history organized by Oxford University’s Department of Continuing Education. This volume, the seventh in a projected series of ten on places of worship, covers the building, restoration, and adaptation of churches, chapels, and synagogues in the British Isles in a period when population growth, economic resources, and denominational competition encouraged a dramatic expansion in the religious built environment. The thirteen chapters range from overviews of Ireland, Scotland, and Welsh Nonconformity to studies of worship and music, English Roman Catholic cathedrals, Catholic monasteries, Orthodox churches, and synagogues. Geoff Brandwood and Michael Hall provide expert analysis of the Cambridge Camden Society and Anglican High Church architecture after 1870, respectively; both chapters are enriched by outstanding illustrations. William Whyte supplies an introduction, while Paul Barnwell gathers up the threads of the volume and provides plentiful material on denominational contexts in a substantial conclusion. Methodism, in its various branches, appears in Clyde Binfield’s lively survey of Protestant Nonconformity and in Susan Fielding’s chapter on Wales. At a time when historic chapels are falling victim to denominational decline and straitened resources, or to an enthusiasm for selling property assets to raise funds for other purposes, an awareness of the history and significance of nineteenth-century buildings is much needed, and this excellent volume is very welcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it