MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Places of Worship in Britain and Ireland, 1829–1929

2024· article· en· W4390972734 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martin Wellings

Bibliographic record

VenueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorshipHistoryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Rewley House Studies in the Historic Environment have established a track record of publishing the valuable papers given at conferences on architectural history organized by Oxford University’s Department of Continuing Education. This volume, the seventh in a projected series of ten on places of worship, covers the building, restoration, and adaptation of churches, chapels, and synagogues in the British Isles in a period when population growth, economic resources, and denominational competition encouraged a dramatic expansion in the religious built environment. The thirteen chapters range from overviews of Ireland, Scotland, and Welsh Nonconformity to studies of worship and music, English Roman Catholic cathedrals, Catholic monasteries, Orthodox churches, and synagogues. Geoff Brandwood and Michael Hall provide expert analysis of the Cambridge Camden Society and Anglican High Church architecture after 1870, respectively; both chapters are enriched by outstanding illustrations. William Whyte supplies an introduction, while Paul Barnwell gathers up the threads of the volume and provides plentiful material on denominational contexts in a substantial conclusion. Methodism, in its various branches, appears in Clyde Binfield’s lively survey of Protestant Nonconformity and in Susan Fielding’s chapter on Wales. At a time when historic chapels are falling victim to denominational decline and straitened resources, or to an enthusiasm for selling property assets to raise funds for other purposes, an awareness of the history and significance of nineteenth-century buildings is much needed, and this excellent volume is very welcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWesley and Methodist StudiesSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207