MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Born in Crisis and Shaped by Controversy. <i>The Relevant History of Methodism, Volume 1:</i> Born in Crisis

2024· article· en· W4390972736 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jonathan Dean

Bibliographic record

VenueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethodismVolume (thermodynamics)HistoryPhilosophyTheologyThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This, as the title suggests, is the first in a projected two-volume set exploring the rise and character of early Methodism. John Tyson is Professor Emeritus of Church History at Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School and the author of several previous volumes on Wesleyan thought, early Methodism, and the eighteenth-century Evangelical Revivals. The aim of this volume (and its successor) is to place the early Methodist movement in its proper historical context. Volume 1, Born in Crisis, does so by outlining the exigencies of the times in which the Wesleys and their followers lived and worked. Tyson does this through a number of ‘lenses’: the challenge of ‘reason’ to traditional Christian faith, the contemporary state of the Church of England, and the realities of societal divisions, including those relating to class, wealth, gender equality, and racial and religious prejudice.In each chapter, Tyson outlines, succinctly and with clarity, something of the nature of the theme, drawing helpfully on contemporary writings, records, and culture. Included are useful illustrations—for instance of the works of Hogarth—which complement the text effectively. He then contrasts the resulting picture with the ways in which the leaders of early Methodism, especially John Wesley, responded to, critiqued, and was in dialogue with them. In this, Tyson’s immersion in the writings of Wesley is clear, and he draws skilfully on a range of texts to ground his case.The book is written primarily for those seeking an introduction to early Methodism, approaching the subject by trying to see its rise and character from the ‘outside’ of the society in which it was formed. Tyson’s brevity and clarity are great advantages in this; he does not overwhelm the reader, and he makes his points with conciseness and obvious expertise. A downside of this is that some of the complex topics he is dealing with can seem rather too quickly summarized, and even sometimes a little caricatured. For instance, his examination of the Church of England seems to fall a little into a rather easy and outdated stereotyped account of a moribund and universally apathetic institution, and it neglects to draw out the depth and fervency of Wesley’s own devotion to it as the national church. The manner of Tyson’s approach thus leaves little time for the kind of nuance that would be ideal but for an introductory text that may not matter too much.There are a number of consistent typographical errors, especially in punctuation, and a few factual inaccuracies (Jonathan Swift was dean, and not bishop, in Dublin). Tyson’s praiseworthy efforts to write in accessible language also occasionally leads him into some curious anachronisms, such as describing Wesley’s working contemporaries as living ‘from paycheck to paycheck’. But overall, this volume is an admirable contribution in offering a straightforward account of the rise of Methodism in its own context and is likely to be of value and utility to those seeking to approach it for the first time. The second volume, Shaped by Controversy, will endeavour to explore Methodism’s inner divisions and debates. In all of this, Tyson holds up a ‘distant mirror’ to enable and encourage twenty-first-century Christians to ponder the contexts and challenges of their own faith, and each chapter concludes with a series of questions designed to facilitate this conversation among his readers. In that aim, it will likely be important to read both volumes together as modern Methodists continue to wrestle with their own responses to living out their faith in divided and anxious days and amid great upheavals in both church and society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.021
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWesley and Methodist Studies→Same topicBiblical Studies and Interpretation→French-language works237,207→