Halloween genes are expressed with a circadian rhythm during development in prothoracic glands of the insect RHODNIUS PROLIXUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We analyse the developmental and circadian profiles of expression of the genes responsible for ecdysteroidogenesis (Halloween genes) in the PGs of Rhodnius prolixus throughout larval-adult development. Extensive use of in vitro techniques enabled multiple different parameters to be measured in individual PGs. Expression of disembodied and spook closely paralleled the ecdysteroid synthesis of the same PGs, and the ecdysteroid titre in vivo, but with functionally significant exceptions. Various tissues other than PGs expressed one, both or neither genes. Both gonads express both genes in pharate adults (larvae close to ecdysis). Both genes were expressed at low, but significant, levels in UF Rhodnius, raising questions concerning how developmental arrest is maintained in UF animals. IHC confirmed the subcellular localisation of the coded proteins. Gene knockdown suppressed transcription of both genes and ecdysteroid synthesis, with spook apparently regulating the downstream gene disembodied. Transcription of both genes occurred with a daily rhythm (with peaks at night) that was confirmed to be under circadian control using aperiodic conditions. The complex behaviour of the rhythm in LL implied two anatomically distinct oscillators regulate this transcription rhythm. First, the circadian clock in the PGs and second, the circadian rhythm of of Rhodnius PTTH which is released rhythmically from the brain under control of the circadian clock therein, both of which were described previously. We conclude ecdysteroidogenesis in Rhodnius PGs employs a similar pathway as other insects, but its control is complex, involving mechanisms both within and outside the PGs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".