MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390982461 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25173

<scp>Eosin‐G</scp> and ethyl eosin dye sensitized <scp>CdS</scp> nanowires towards dye sensitized solar cells applications

2024· article· en· W4390982461 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bhoomi Khodiyar, Avinash C. Mendhe, Tushar B. Deshmukh, Babasaheb R. Sankapal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEosin YEosinDye-sensitized solar cellMaterials scienceDielectric spectroscopyAbsorption (acoustics)OptoelectronicsChemistryElectrolyteElectrochemistryStainingPhotocatalysisComposite materialElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract One dimensional (1‐D) CdS nanowires have been grown through a low temperature chemical route and have been sensitized with eosin‐G and ethyl eosin dyes to broaden the absorption spectrum of CdS and to enhance the photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance under illumination. The used method is advantageous due to its simplicity, low cost, scalability, and controllability. Interestingly, eosin‐G and ethyl eosin dyes yield nearly four‐ and six‐fold increase in device efficiency compared to bare CdS when tested in dye‐sensitized solar cell assembly. Structural, surface morphological, optical, and surface wettability studies have been formulated for CdS, whereas identification of materials along with PEC investigations were conducted through current density–voltage (J‐V), external quantum efficiency (EQE), characteristics under the illumination of 94.6 mW/cm 2 (AM 1.5G), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207