MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Does perceived caloric and nutrient intake influence the acute effect of beverage consumption on cardiovascular function?

2024· article· en· W4390984486 on OpenAlexafffund
Ellen McGarity‐Shipley, Melanie E. Vitez, Evan D. Curd, Raelisa Etwaroo, Emily J. Ferguson, Lindsay A. Lew, Chris McGlory, Kyra E. Pyke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsResponse Biomedical (Canada)Queen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineInsulinBrachial arteryEndocrinologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This was the first study to investigate how perceived nutritional content influences the impact of a high-sugar/fat beverage on endothelial function. We found that a high-sugar/fat beverage only reduced endothelial function when it was presented to participants as high in calories, fat, and sugar. This suggests that perceived nutritional information contributes to the impact of high sugar and fat intake on endothelial function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Physiology→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→