MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390988088 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b77

Brightest Cluster Galaxy Formation in the z = 4.3 Protocluster SPT 2349-56: Discovery of a Radio-loud Active Galactic Nucleus

2024· article· en· W4390988088 on OpenAlexafffund
S. C. Chapman, Ryley Hill, Manuel Aravena, M. Archipley, Arif Babul, James Burgoyne, Rebecca Canning, Roger Deane, C. De Breuck, Anthony H. Gonzalez, Christopher C. Hayward, Seon Woo Kim, Matthew A. Malkan, Daniel P. Marrone, V. J. McIntyre, E. J. Murphy, Emily Pass, Ryan W. Perry, Kedar A. Phadke, Douglas Rennehan, C. Reuter, K. M. Rotermund, D. Scott, Manuel Solimano, Justin Spilker, A. A. Stark, Nikolaus Sulzenauer, N. F. H. Tothill, J. D. Vieira, David Vizgan, George T. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British ColumbiaDalhousie UniversityHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersNational Institutes of Natural SciencesComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanMax-Planck-GesellschaftNational Research FoundationAustralian GovernmentCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryScience and Industry Endowment FundGovernment of Western AustraliaKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsActive galactic nucleusAstrophysicsGalaxyAstronomyRadio galaxySubmillimeter ArrayRadio telescopeGalaxy clusterRedshiftLuminosityLuminous infrared galaxyStar formationCluster (spacecraft)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have observed the z = 4.3 protocluster SPT2349−56 with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) with the aim of detecting radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs) among the ∼30 submillimeter (submm) galaxies (SMGs) identified in the structure. We detect the central complex of submm sources at 2.2 GHz with a luminosity of L 2.2 = (4.42 ± 0.56) × 10 25 W Hz −1 . MeerKAT and the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder also detect the source at 816 MHz and 888 MHz, respectively, constraining the radio spectral index to α = −1.45 ± 0.16, implying L 1.4,rest = (2.2 ± 0.2) × 10 26 W Hz −1 . The radio observations do not have sufficient spatial resolution to uniquely identify one of the three Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) galaxies as the AGN, however the ALMA source properties themselves suggest a likely host. This radio luminosity is ∼100× higher than expected from star formation, assuming the usual far-infrared–radio correlation, indicating an AGN driven by a forming brightest cluster galaxy. None of the SMGs in SPT2349−56 show signs of AGNs in any other diagnostics available to us, highlighting the radio continuum as a powerful probe of obscured AGNs. We compare these results to field samples of radio sources and SMGs, along with the 22 gravitationally lensed SPT-SMGs also observed in the ATCA program, as well as powerful radio galaxies at high redshifts. The (3.3 ± 0.7) × 10 38 W of power from the radio-loud AGN sustained over 100 Myr is comparable to the binding energy of the gas mass of the central halo, and similar to the instantaneous energy injection from supernova feedback from the SMGs in the core region. The SPT2349−56 radio-loud AGNs may be providing strong feedback on a nascent intracluster medium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→