Air pollution prediction and backcasting through a combination of mobile monitoring and historical on-road traffic emission inventories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An important challenge for studies of air pollution and health effects is the derivation of historical exposures. These generally entail some form of backcasting, which refers to a range of approaches that aim to project a current surface into the past. Accurate backcasting is conditional upon the availability of historical data for predictor variables and the ability to capture spatial and temporal trends in these variables. This study proposes a method to backcast traffic-related air pollution surfaces developed using land-use regression models by including temporal variability of traffic and emissions and trends in concentrations measured at reference stations. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations collected in the City of Toronto using the Urban Scanner mobile platform were adjusted for historical trends captured at reference stations. The Bayesian Estimator of Abrupt change, Seasonal change, and Trend (BEAST), a powerful tool for time series decomposition, was employed to isolate seasonal variations, annual trends, and abrupt changes in NO2 at reference stations, hence decomposing the signal. Exposure surfaces were generated for a period extending from 2006 to 2020, exhibiting decreases ranging from 10 to 50 % depending on the neighborhood, with an average of 20.46 % across the city. Yearly surfaces were intersected with mobility patterns of Torontonians extracted from travel survey data for 2006 and 2016, illustrating strong spatial gradients in the evolution of NO2 over time, with larger decreases along major roads and highways and in the central core. These findings demonstrate that air pollution improvements throughout the 14 years are inhomogeneous across space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".