MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Lightweight CNN Spike Sorting Method Enhanced by Scattering Convolution Network

2023· article· en· W4390993403 on OpenAlexaff
Ruize Sun, Xinzi Xu, Qiao Cai, Hongqian Wang, Qinxin Zhou, Yang Zhao, Yong Lian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsComputer scienceSortingSpike sortingComputationSpike (software development)Convolutional neural networkConvolution (computer science)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Transmission (telecommunications)WaveletReduction (mathematics)Artificial neural networkAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spike sorting is an effective approach for analysis of neuron activities. With the increasing number of recording channels, online spike sorting is seen as a promising solution to relax the wireless transmission burden. Deep learning based methods provide superior spike sorting accuracy but require intensive computation offsetting the efficient transmission. To cut down the computation cost, a scattering convolution network (SCN) is proposed to extract features via wavelet scattering transform, then a lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) is capable of sorting the spikes accurately. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed SCN-CNN method achieves over 92% computation reduction and maintains a high classification accuracy of up to 99.97%, showing huge potential for online spike sorting on large-scale neural probes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural dynamics and brain function→French-language works237,207→